Thomas Braithwaite vs Nico Rating Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Jul at 10:06 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Braithwaite vs N. Rating

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Braithwaite 1 - 0 Rating
They have played 2 sets in total, with Thomas Braithwaite winning 2 and Nico Rating winning 0. The last match between Thomas Braithwaite and Nico Rating was at the M25 Porto, 22-07-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Thomas Braithwaite getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Braithwaite | 1 |
| Rating | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M25 Porto(07-22-25)
T. Braithwaite vs N. Rating H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.71% (93-71) | Career Total W/L | 40.58% (28-41) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Braithwaite vs N. Rating Match Preview:
- When it comes to second serve success over the past six months, Braithwaite leads by winning 46.42% of points, compared to Rating's 33.33%. Could this give Braithwaite the upper hand? It's quite possible.
- In terms of returning their opponent's second serve, Braithwaite again shows an advantage at 47.1%, outperforming Rating's 38.46%. Interestingly, for first serve returns, Rating takes the edge with 33.33% over Braithwaite's 26.89%.
- Under pressure, such as in breakpoint scenarios, Braithwaite has a slight lead with 58.5% saved compared to Rating's 57.14%. Could this be crucial in determining the match outcome? It's worth considering.
- Overall, in the past year, Braithwaite has been slightly more successful, winning 55.32% of matches versus Rating's 51.61%.
- Their preferred playing surfaces differ: Braithwaite excels on Grass with a 62% win rate, while Rating favors Clay with a 41% success rate.
- Both players mainly compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, with Braithwaite winning slightly more at 55.81% compared to Rating's 51.61%.
- Looking at opponent difficulty, Rating has faced higher-ranked players (average rank of 136.94) compared to Braithwaite's average opponent rank of 388.13.
- In deciding sets, Braithwaite has a better record, winning 65% of such matches over the last year, while Rating has a 50% win rate.
- In break point conversion, Rating shows a remarkable performance with a 100% success rate, starkly contrasting with Braithwaite's 29.88%.
Editorial Prediction (July 22, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing recent performance metrics and career trends, Braithwaite demonstrates consistent superiority in second serve efficacy and return game statistics, both critical in predicting match outcomes.
While Braithwaite excels mainly on Grass, the match's surface will be influential in predicting success. However, it's crucial to observe the current form in the ongoing event, as players' performance can vary significantly based on tournament familiarity.
Although Rating's ability to convert break points is notably high, Braithwaite's overall performance across pressure situations, especially in deciding sets, suggests a greater resilience that could prove pivotal.
Considering these factors, and despite Rating's tougher competition, Braithwaite appears to have the edge and is favored to win this upcoming tennis match.
Thomas Braithwaite vs Nico Rating Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Braithwaite vs N. Rating H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:25:11 | Average Match Time | 1:25:11 |
| 67% (32/48) | 1st Serve % | 61% (31/51) |
| 84% (27/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (21/31) |
| 56% (9/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (8/20) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (22/51) | Return Points Win % | 25% (12/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Braithwaite Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-0 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-1 2-6 10-5 | ||
R2 | L | 1-6 6-3 7-6(3) | ||
N. Rating Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-1 4-6 12-10 | ||
Q1 | W | 2-6 6-2 10-8 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q2 | W | 7-5 7-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||

T. Braithwaite vs N. Rating Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.71% (93/71) | YTD Win/Loss | 40.58% (28/41) |
| 53.83% (204/175) | Sets Win/Loss | 39.74% (60/91) |
| 52.19% (1922/1761) | Games Win/Loss | 45.49% (655/785) |
| 56.43% (79/61) | Hard Win/Loss | 39.29% (11/17) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 41.46% (17/24) |
| 61.90% (13/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 515 | Aces Total | 51 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.04 |
| 279 | Total Double Faults | 29 |
| 1:20:26 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 294.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 133.49 |
| 69% (5737/8323) | 1st Serve % | 60% (527/879) |
| 67% (3858/5737) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (344/527) |
| 50% (1297/2586) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (151/352) |
| 38% (286/755) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (22/53) |
| 38% (3092/8237) | Return Points Win % | 35% (271/779) |
| 30.00% (3/7) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58.44% (90/64) | Futures W/L | 40.58% (28/41) |
| 57% (93/163) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 39% (26/67) |
| 35% (16/46) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (6/9) |
| 65% (34/52) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (9/15) |
| 90% (80/72) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (28/23) |
| 10% (80/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (28/5) |
| 25% (84/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (41/4) |